From e105a6ec6bf79048c3e2a65e02ac26ea73a58614 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: yairm210 Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2024 13:15:10 +0300 Subject: [PATCH] Resolved #12261 - documented explicit discrepancy from Civ V regarding great warpath railroad connection --- docs/Other/Intentional-departures-from-Civ-V.md | 6 ++++++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) diff --git a/docs/Other/Intentional-departures-from-Civ-V.md b/docs/Other/Intentional-departures-from-Civ-V.md index d16684e469..14130e8705 100644 --- a/docs/Other/Intentional-departures-from-Civ-V.md +++ b/docs/Other/Intentional-departures-from-Civ-V.md @@ -17,3 +17,9 @@ In Civ V, this is the behavior of Hills and Mountains, but not of Jungle and For And yet, Jungle and Forest *can block* Hills, and Hills+Forest can block Mountains from view - so they must be the same height! This part of Civ V visibility makes no sense, considering the otherwise well-structured visibility logic, and we consider this to be a bug. + +## Great Warpath does not provide railroad bonuses for connected cities + +This is [a discrepancy in Civ V rules](https://github.com/yairm210/Unciv/issues/12261) - if all jungles are like roads, then they shouldn't be considered railroads for production purposes. + +The idea is that if you can quickly transport goods with railroads that yields a production bonus - moving fast through jungles may be possible, but not with industrial amounts of goods.